Current Dilemma: A-Bias is strong, so the attacker almost always wins. Will try to fix, but it will be difficult. I'm thinking of adding multiple interpretations like Josh (which seems to mostly fix the issue) but I don't exactly want to just copy it. Edit: Slightly Fixed (?) by defining A as the attacking argument and B as defendant in the prompt. This rule tests out whether or not your character is stronger than another character. It's a "My character beats your character" rule with a judge. The judge will make an essay comparing your character and your opponent to determine who is stronger. The descriptions you make for your character will be treated as an argument by the AI for them to analyze, and the judge itself was given a metric to compare both characters with. The stronger one is declared the winner. This rule is still in its testing phase. Like Josh's Ascendancies rule, {u} is not allowed to reduce bias as much as possible (Although AI will still be biased. But hey, atleast it's minimized) [Optional (For Fun)]: I like to classify things, so you can do the same and classify your character into the following ranks in your character's name. Of course, the ranks will not affect the output as long as you put your character's name in the Prompt Name, which ignores the normal character name. - Mortal: Overall power can affect &/or resist below planetary scales. - Neophyte of Divinity: Overall power can affect &/or resist below universal scales. - Ascendant: Overall power can affect &/or resist below multiversal scales - Demi-God: Overall power can affect &/or resist below hyperversal scales - Divinity: Overall power can affect &/or resist below omniversal scales - Absolute Divinity: Scaling can no longer describe your power.